Take the Diabetes Health Pump Survey
See What's Inside
Read this FREE issue now
For healthcare professionals only
  • 12 Tips for Traveling With Diabetes
See the entire table of contents here!

You can view the current or previous issues of Diabetes Health online, in their entirety, anytime you want.
Click Here To View

See if you qualify for our free healthcare professional magazines. Click here to start your application for Pre-Diabetes Health, Diabetes Health Pharmacist and Diabetes Health Professional.

Learn More About the Professional Subscription

Free Diabetes Health e-Newsletter
Latest
Popular
Top Rated
Diabetes Health Reference Charts
Nutrition Research Archives
Print | Email | Share | Comments (2)

Is the Glycemic Index Really Reliable?


Oct 18, 2007

See also "A Glycemic Index Expert Responds to the Tufts Research", by Professor Jennie Brand-Miller, PhD.

When calculating glycemic index (GI) values, glucose is arbitrarily given the highest GI value: 100. To assign a GI value to another type of carb, a complex process is used to compare the blood sugar response elicited by the test carb to the blood sugar response provoked by glucose.

Then the test carb is assigned a GI value somewhere below 100, based upon its overall effect on blood glucose in comparison to pure glucose.

Previous studies have assigned white bread an average GI value of about 70, indicating that white bread has approximately seventy percent of the glycemic impact of pure glucose. But now a study of individual blood glucose responses to white bread has raised questions about how reliable that number is.

In the study, performed by researchers from Tufts University, twenty-three healthy adults were seen for up to three sets of testing, each set consisting of two visits. During one visit, they were given fifty grams of carbs in the form of white bread, and their blood sugar response to the bread over a two-hour period was measured.

On the second visit, their blood sugar response to fifty grams of glucose was measured. By using a calculation to compare their response to each food, the GI value of the bread was generated.

By averaging the GI values derived from the participants who completed all three sets of tests, this study produced a GI value of about 70 for the bread, very close to the previously published value. However, when the researchers looked at each individual's response to the white bread on different days, they found GI values for the bread that ranged from 44 to 132.

The between-individual variation in blood glucose responses was less, about 17 percent, but the within-individual variation was about 43 percent. The researchers believe that their findings cast some doubt on the utility of the glycemic index.

Sources: Medpage Today, Diabetes Care, September 2007


Categories: Blood Glucose, Blood Sugar, Diabetes, Diabetes, Diets, Food, Glycemic Index & Carb Counting, Nutrition Research, Professional Issues



You May Also Be Interested In...


Comments

Posted by Anonymous on 15 November 2007

The weight is just falling off me on the low GI diet, but not off my husband who has normal blood sugar.

Posted by Anonymous on 10 December 2007

3 mos. ago my first visit to doctors office my glucose after a blood draw was 127 and my glycemic A1C was 6.1. After 3 mos. being put on 1500 calorie diet, carb watching and blood glucose daily draws twice a day 2 hrs after meals, alternating between breakfast, lunch and dinner. My 2nd 3 mos. visit back to doctor after a blood draw my blood glucose was 90, 37 points less, well within normal range. But my A1C was 6.6. I'm not on any pill or insulin. What's up with A1C increase? My 3 mos. of metering glucose daily average for 170 times for 3 mos. was 95, 1 time it was 136.


Add your comments about this article below. You can add comments as a registered user or anonymously. If you choose to post anonymously your comments will be sent to our moderator for approval before they appear on this page. If you choose to post as a registered user your comments will appear instantly.

When voicing your views via the comment feature, please respect the Diabetes Health community by refraining from comments that could be considered offensive to other people. Diabetes Health reserves the right to remove comments when necessary to maintain the cordial voice of the diabetes community.

For your privacy and protection, we ask that you do not include personal details such as address or telephone number in any comments posted.

Don't have your Diabetes Health Username? Register now and add your comments to all our content.

Have Your Say...


Username: Password:
Comment:
©1991-2014 Diabetes Health | Home | Privacy | Press | Advertising | Help | Contact Us | Donate | Sitemap

Diabetes Health Medical Disclaimer

The information on this site is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. All content, including text, graphics, images, and information, contained on or available through this website is for general information purposes only. Opinions expressed here are the opinions of writers, contributors, and commentators, and are not necessarily those of Diabetes Health. Never disregard professional medical advice or delay seeking medical treatment because of something you have read on or accessed through this website.