Stevia and the Food and Drug Administration: A Tangled Tale

| Oct 24, 2007

Stevia is a natural sweetener made from the leaves of a South American herb, Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni, commonly known as sweetleaf or sugarleaf.

It's a rather controversial herb, in that it has been approved as a food additive in several countries, including Brazil, China, and Japan, but has been banned in Europe, Hongkong, and Singapore.

In America, we've gone at it both ways: Stevia can be sold as a dietary supplement, but it cannot be promoted as a sweetener or used as a food additive.

The FDA categorizes stevia as "an unsafe food additive" because "there is no regulation in effect that provides for the safe use of stevia, nor is there a sufficient basis to conclude that stevia is generally recognized as safe among qualified experts for its intended use in food."

In fact, says the FDA, "literature reports have raised safety concerns about the use of stevia, including concerns about control of blood sugar and effects upon the reproductive, cardiovascular, and renal systems."

Stevia has been labeled as an "unsafe food additive" since 1991, when its import was restricted at the request of an anonymous party. The complainant has never been identified, but many stevia enthusiasts believe that the sweetener industry was behind the complaint. Stevia remained banned until 1995, when the 1994 Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act forced the FDA to allow stevia as a dietary supplement, although not as a food additive.

There have been some investigations into the safety of stevia, most of which are criticized as poorly done by stevia enthusiasts. According to one study, male rats fed high doses of stevioside (the component of stevia that makes it sweet) for 22 months ended up with reduced sperm production.

When female hamsters were fed large amounts of a derivative of stevioside called steviol, they had fewer and smaller offspring. In the laboratory, steviol can be converted into a compound that may promote cancer by causing mutations in DNA; however, whether that conversion happens in humans is questionable. Finally, very large amounts of stevioside reportedly can interfere with the absorption of carbohydrates in animals and disrupt the conversion of food into energy within cells.

Stevia proponents brush aside these studies as flawed, preferring to point to recent research by the World Health Organization (WHO), which concluded in 2006 that stevioside is not genotoxic, that the genotoxicity of steviol in the test tube doesn't occur in living creatures, and that evidence of carcinogenic activity does not exist.

During thirty years of stevia use in Japan, no adverse reactions have surfaced. On the other hand, the Japanese are apparently moderate in their stevia consumption, whereas there is some concern by the powers that be that we gluttonous Americans would pile on the stevia to potentially toxic levels. It does appear, however, that if you use stevia leaves sparingly, you should be okay.

Sources: FDA, August 2007; Medline Plus; Wikipedia; Center for Science in the Public Interest

Click Here To View Or Post Comments

Categories: Blood Sugar, Food, Food News, Nutrition Research, Professional Issues, Type 1 Issues, Vitamins

Take the Diabetes Health Pump Survey
See What's Inside
Read this FREE issue now
For healthcare professionals only

You can view the current or previous issues of Diabetes Health online, in their entirety, anytime you want.
Click Here To View

See if you qualify for our free healthcare professional magazines. Click here to start your application for Pre-Diabetes Health, Diabetes Health Pharmacist and Diabetes Health Professional.

Learn More About the Professional Subscription

Free Diabetes Health e-Newsletter

Top Rated
Print | Email | Share | Comments (7)

You May Also Be Interested In...


Posted by Anonymous on 26 October 2007

I've been using stevia in my morning 2-cups of coffee for 10 years. No signs of a third limb or eye and I don't have problems with my reproductive organs. I'm also type 1 diabetic and have a A1c of 5.4. What's really going on with the FDA?

Posted by Anonymous on 31 October 2007

I have used Stevia for 5 years now and love it! Why would you use a product that has chemicals and toxins in it (even though it has been approved by the FDA) instead of using an all natural product?

Posted by Anonymous on 3 November 2007

I buy Stevia from my local Seattle food co-op, Puget Consumers Co-op. Only tiny amounts are needed. It has no sugars, no lactose, malto-dextrin, no corn syrup added.

Posted by mgordon on 11 November 2007

I only use 1/3 of a pack of Stevia when adding to beverages. Using the entire packet makes beverages too sweet. A box of 50 lasts me 5-6 months.

Posted by Anonymous on 13 November 2007

Coming from Canada I have used Stevia for several years and like it.No side effects.I look hard to find it as it is not sold everywhere.There are no chemicals to worry about in Stevia.Other sweetners taste bitter to me.This one doesn't.Being diabetic I must take care of me.I agree that others don't want Stevia because it is a healthy, natural sweetner.

Posted by Anonymous on 10 February 2008

Cargill and Coke are developing a Stevia based sweetener called Rebiana. You'll see it approved by the FDA in a few years. Another natural sweetener with a bright future is Luo Han Guo, currently being studied by many including Tate & Lyle - Splenda manufacturers.

They're both safe.

Posted by Anonymous on 9 November 2008

"...male rats fed high doses of stevioside (the component of stevia that makes it sweet) for 22 months ended up with reduced sperm production."

Um... 22 months is OLD for a rat. It's no wonder they ended up with reduced sperm production.

Add your comments about this article below. You can add comments as a registered user or anonymously. If you choose to post anonymously your comments will be sent to our moderator for approval before they appear on this page. If you choose to post as a registered user your comments will appear instantly.

When voicing your views via the comment feature, please respect the Diabetes Health community by refraining from comments that could be considered offensive to other people. Diabetes Health reserves the right to remove comments when necessary to maintain the cordial voice of the diabetes community.

For your privacy and protection, we ask that you do not include personal details such as address or telephone number in any comments posted.

Don't have your Diabetes Health Username? Register now and add your comments to all our content.

Have Your Say...

Username: Password:
©1991-2014 Diabetes Health | Home | Privacy | Press | Advertising | Help | Contact Us | Donate | Sitemap

Diabetes Health Medical Disclaimer

The information on this site is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. All content, including text, graphics, images, and information, contained on or available through this website is for general information purposes only. Opinions expressed here are the opinions of writers, contributors, and commentators, and are not necessarily those of Diabetes Health. Never disregard professional medical advice or delay seeking medical treatment because of something you have read on or accessed through this website.