Insulin: How To Restore A Tarnished Miracle

James S. Hirsch is the author of "Cheating Destiny: Living with Diabetes", published in 2006 and now available in paperback. He is the managing editor of diaTribe (www.diatribe.us), an online newsletter for patients with diabetes, where this story originally appeared.

Editor's Note: We previously published an erroneous link to James Hirsch's organization, diaTribe, and regret the error. The correct link, as noted above, is www.diatribe.us.

James enjoying a baseball game with his son Garrett

| Nov 20, 2007

It was hailed as a "miracle cure," restoring life to the "erstwhile dead" and delivering not just health, but "salvation." Discovered in 1922, insulin did not live up to the initial euphoria - it didn't cure anything - but the life-saving elixir still stands as one of the greatest breakthroughs in medical history.

But a funny thing happened to insulin's halo. It's been replaced by an albatross. Though the product is purer and better than ever before, insulin is often underused by type 1 diabetics and frequently avoided by type 2 patients who should be taking it. Insulin is often feared, reviled, misunderstood, poorly taught, used incorrectly, or neglected. At the January 2007 ADA post-grad meeting in New York, Dr. Arturo Rollo of Harvard Medical School said that delaying insulin therapy for type 2 patients was the greatest disaster in primary care.

Even when insulin is used properly, sometimes it has to be called a different name. Dr. Lois Jovanovic, the director of research and chief scientific officer of Sansum Diabetes Research Institute in Santa Barbara, California, realized that many of her Mexican-American patients feared insulin because they recalled that it had been given to an aging diabetic ancestor long after it could do much good. Insulin seemed like a precursor to death. "The word was terrifying, because it's the drug that killed everyone in the family," said Dr. Jovanovic, who has type 1 herself. To convince these patients to accept insulin therapy, she uses insulin pens, calling them las plumas.

Ironically, the need for insulin has never been greater. Type 1 patients, of course, whose numbers are growing, need the injected hormone to live. But the real epidemic is occurring in type 2 diabetes - and that's where insulin's underuse is most glaring. An estimated thirty percent of type 2 patients take insulin, but David M. Nathan, head of the diabetes unit at Massachusetts General Hospital, believes that sixty percent need it to achieve near-normal blood sugars.

What makes insulin's fall from grace so jarring is that it was once the very symbol of modern science defeating an ancient disease. After its discovery, widely published photographs demonstrated insulin's miraculous power to literally restore flesh to bones. "A Boon to the Human Race," shouted an early ad from Eli Lilly, which was the first company to mass produce insulin. Another ad by Eli Lilly showed a beautiful bride kissing her beaming father, the happy groom in the background, with the tagline: "Our favorite picture of insulin."

To be sure, many patients remain grateful for this "miracle," and I, for one, remain in awe. When I took injections (I now use a pump), I would sometimes paraphrase Shakespeare with the words "Insulin, do thy deed." Which was, keep me alive for another day. And when my young son took his first shot, the heartbreak of his diagnosis was leavened by the knowledge that insulin would save him from death.

So how did insulin lose its groove? Some concerns are longstanding. Insulin sometimes causes weight gain because patients now retain their nutrients, and excessive insulin can cause hypoglycemia, which itself can be a killer. (Nietzsche said, "That which does not kill me, makes me stronger." With insulin, the inverse is true: "That which makes me stronger, can also kill me.")

The more pressing issue is with type 2 diabetics. It was long assumed that they avoided insulin because they feared the injections, but the extraordinary success of Byetta, an injectable drug for type 2 patients, has undermined that argument. The real problem with insulin is that it is equated with failure or punishment. According to this view, type 2 patients who can't maintain good control with diet, exercise, and oral agents must suffer the consequences with insulin. Some doctors reinforce this perception by threatening their patients that they will have to start shots unless they lose weight. Insulin can also represent the needs of a body in its final throes, so avoiding it is a form of denial.

"There is a fear of insulin in that it represents the final stage," said Paul S. Jellinger, president of the American College of Endocrinology. "The connotation is that you're about to lose a leg, or whatever."

This view is both shortsighted and wrong. Type 2 diabetes is a "progressive" disease, which means that beta cells become increasingly impaired over time. If a type 2 patient lives long enough, in most cases that individual will essentially have the same beta cell function - little or none - as a type 1 patient. Thus, the goal of every type 2 patient should be to live long enough to require insulin.

Healthcare providers also shoulder some of the blame. Initiating insulin therapy for any patient is time consuming, so doctors who receive no extra compensation for good care may prefer to delay the burdens (their own) of insulin. (Some doctors also delay type 2 oral agents because they then have to deal with patients' adverse side effects.) Doctors also underprescribe insulin for type 1 patients because they fear getting sued over a severe hypoglycemic incident, or perhaps they just don't want to be bothered with late-night phone calls. "Hyperglycemia is considered the patient's fault; hypoglycemia, the doctor's fault," said Dr. John Holcombe, Medical Fellow at Eli Lilly.

To restore insulin's luster, at minimum healthcare providers need to be taught how to use it. Many in training don't even know what it looks like. My brother, Dr. Irl Hirsch, runs a diabetes clinic for the University of Washington in Seattle, and when students or residents assist him, he has to show them what a vial of insulin looks like. "Even the fellows are clueless," he said.

Patients must also be convinced about the indispensability of the product, particularly in the high-tech age of insulin analogs: rapid-acting, peakless, inhaled, and formulations we've not yet envisioned. I would love to see the principal manufacturers - Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly, and sanofi-aventis - sponsor a marketing campaign to remind patients that insulin is not a sign of weakness or failure, but a product with a glorious history and marvelous future. I would put a tall vial next to a precious child, with the tagline: "Insulin. The Miracle Keeps Getting Better."

Click Here To View Or Post Comments

Categories: Diabetes, Diabetes, Insulin, Losing weight, Low Blood Sugar, Novo Nordisk, Type 1 Issues, Type 2 Issues


Take the Diabetes Health Pump Survey
See What's Inside
Read this FREE issue now
For healthcare professionals only
  • What's on the Horizon with Diabetes Research and Therapy
See the entire table of contents here!

You can view the current or previous issues of Diabetes Health online, in their entirety, anytime you want.
Click Here To View

See if you qualify for our free healthcare professional magazines. Click here to start your application for Pre-Diabetes Health, Diabetes Health Pharmacist and Diabetes Health Professional.

Learn More About the Professional Subscription

Free Diabetes Health e-Newsletter

Latest
Popular
Top Rated
Print | Email | Share | Comments (7)

You May Also Be Interested In...


Comments

Posted by ricklude on 21 November 2007

For the longest time, I put off the use of injectionable insulin becouse, I "feared the needle". I watched as my mother gave herself "shots" and sometimes, they would hurt her.
Being a type 2, I put my every hope into any new oral medication I heard of comming into use but, no matter what research I did for myself and my endo's information, nothing else has shown itself as vastly improving my condition other than those oral meds I've always taken.
I have been taking "Lantus" sub-q for a few months now and It has greatly improved my blood sugar readings and general physical condition as well. The ultra fine needles literally slide in under the weight of the pen the Lantus comes in.
No pain! No ouchies! EVER!
I should have been doing this for myself for a long time and I hope everyone who is a type 2 and could benifit from some form of insulin injection, PLEASE, do try it at least. AND. . . it works! You'll see!

Posted by tom swayne on 21 November 2007

I was diagnosed type 2 18 months ago. My doctor started me on Novalog 70/30 imediately, and it is working greatwith two shots per day, morning and evening. 6 months after starting treatment my a1c was 6.5. It is 5.9 now. I watch my diet exercise to keep my weight down.

Posted by Anonymous on 21 November 2007

As a long time Type 1, I encourage all Type 2s who I meet to not resist taking injections.

Posted by Anonymous on 21 November 2007

I value the observation of insulin sometimes being seen as a sign of failure. I have moments when, if I need more insulin because of illness or lack of activity, I almost don't want to take that extra dose because it feels like proof that my body is failing me. I know, though, that it is the insulin that is enabling me to feel normal and function like everyone else. It is the insulin that is keeping me alive and I can't take that for granted. Insulin is truly an elixir of life.

Posted by Anonymous on 1 December 2007

What the don't tell you is that there IS a risk of cancer from today's insulins.

Posted by Anonymous on 5 December 2007

I agree that this is a great article. I have had Type 1 for 52 years, am a Certified Diabetes Educator, see Dr. Irl Hirsch as my endo, and believe in using Certified Diabetes Educators to help physicians with their patients in using insulin. Thank you for this article!

Posted by Anonymous on 7 December 2007

I have had type 2 diabetes for over 2 years.I control it with metphormine and glyberide plus the job requirements keep me active. This is in Canada, so my range varies between 8 to 4 and once or twice the range was down to 2. In my job, I just can't take time out if we get alarms. They have a priority. Now my question. How and what can be done to get my sex life active again. I believe I also have now E.D., but not fully. Any suggestions would be gratefully received.


Add your comments about this article below. You can add comments as a registered user or anonymously. If you choose to post anonymously your comments will be sent to our moderator for approval before they appear on this page. If you choose to post as a registered user your comments will appear instantly.

When voicing your views via the comment feature, please respect the Diabetes Health community by refraining from comments that could be considered offensive to other people. Diabetes Health reserves the right to remove comments when necessary to maintain the cordial voice of the diabetes community.

For your privacy and protection, we ask that you do not include personal details such as address or telephone number in any comments posted.

Don't have your Diabetes Health Username? Register now and add your comments to all our content.

Have Your Say...


Username: Password:
Comment:
©1991-2014 Diabetes Health | Home | Privacy | Press | Advertising | Help | Contact Us | Donate | Sitemap

Diabetes Health Medical Disclaimer

The information on this site is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. All content, including text, graphics, images, and information, contained on or available through this website is for general information purposes only. Opinions expressed here are the opinions of writers, contributors, and commentators, and are not necessarily those of Diabetes Health. Never disregard professional medical advice or delay seeking medical treatment because of something you have read on or accessed through this website.