Letter of the Week: Mother Caught Between Medtronic and BlueCross BlueShield Refuses to Give Up

Diabetes Health received this letter in late April, 2008. Patti let us know that she received a message from BlueCross BlueShield today that Medtronic has refunded another portion of the credit to them. BCBS and Medtronic continue to try and work out the rest of the claim.

I wasn't going to stop appealing our request with BCBS for payment of the sensors for our daughter, and I won't stop calling Medtronic for a refund until this gets corrected. Our daughter is going to have to live with diabetes for the rest of her life, and if I can do anything to make her life and health issues easier to manage, as a mother I will continue to do that!

| Jun 12, 2008

Dear Diabetes Health,

After reading the story in the April/May Diabetes Health about the mother and daughter who won approval from Blue Cross/Blue Shield to pay for the continuous monitor, I wanted to share our story.

Our daughter was diagnosed with type 1 in April 2002.  Jae had problems regulating her blood sugars for many years, had seizures, and missed a good share of her senior year of high school due to health issues.  She also has polycystic ovarian syndrome and endometriosis.  In November 2006, we purchased Medtronic’s continuous blood glucose monitoring system for her, as she had been an insulin pump user since November 2002.  At the time of purchasing the CBGM System, we were informed by Medtronic that it would be our responsibility to work with BCBS to pay for the sensors.  Medtronic claimed that they did not yet have a billing number to submit to BCBS for the sensors.

In January 2007, I started the appeal process with BCBS of Minnesota to cover the ongoing sensors needed for the CBGM system.  Jae was wearing them daily and thought they were great. She thanked us many times for getting them for her and told us we didn’t need to buy her any Christmas presents in 2006 because not having to test so many times a day was a Christmas present all in itself!  Jae was going through about 10 sensors a month.  Thankfully, my husband and I have been fortunate enough to be able to pay for the sensors without insurance assistance.

I ended up having to file an appeal/request with BCBS three times until finally, in February 2008 (14 months after our initial request), thanks to a very determined and caring customer service liaison at BCBS, the sensors were approved for coverage under Jae’s insurance.  BCBS denied our first request, stating that Jae didn’t meet their criteria for being ill enough to need the CBGM system.  Our second appeal was also denied; this time BCBS claimed that the CBGM system was not FDA-approved.  After sending a copy of the approval letter from the FDA to Medtronic along with our third appeal, five years of A1C results and other historical information, insurance coverage was granted for the sensors.  (This approval was later denied and then overturned after I questioned how BCBS could deny an approval that had just been granted.  Mind you, there were many liaison customer service representatives involved in our case over the 14 months that it took to get this approved.)  From April 2007 through August 2007, I made and documented 10 calls to BCBS, during which I was only able to leave a voice message inquiring about the case and didn’t receive any return phone calls regarding our appeal process.

But the difficulties continued with this request.  BCBS refused to reimburse us for our out-of-pocket expenses, stating that they would pay Medtronic.  I filed paperwork for Medtronic to be reimbursed.  BCBS ended up sending Jae a check for some of the out-of--pocket expenses but then later requested that money back.  Since February 2008, I have called Medtronic 15 times (I have this well documented) requesting our refund.  Though we have received approximately one-third of what is owed to us, Medtronic is refusing to give us the remainder of the credit on our account, stating that BCBS has not paid the claim correctly.  They say that until BCBS pays the claims correctly, they will not refund us any more money.  Medtronic is stating that they will only refund us what BCBS has paid to them.  BCBS has told me that since Medtronic is a provider with BCBS, Medtronic needs to accept what BCBS considers the allowed amount and only charge us for our 20 percent co-pay.  The amount in question is substantial, approximately $1,500.00, that is still owed to us as a refund and is sitting as a credit in our account at Medtronic.  We have always paid our Medtronic bill on time and have no outstanding bill with them.

Throughout my many calls to Medtronic requesting a refund, I have been promised that a supervisor would call me back.  I have heard back on two occasions, out of my 15 calls to Medtronic, from a supervisor.  I have faxed Medtronic requested EOB’s, filed whatever paperwork anyone from either BCBS or Medtronic has requested, made copies and faxed bills, invoices, etc., to BCBS and Medtronic, whatever they have wanted to get this issue resolved.  Unfortunately, the liaison with BCBS who finally obtained our approval retired in March 2008. I joked with her about wanting her home phone number!

I have worked with or received letters from eight different liaisons through the consumer service center at BCBS, talked to 13 different billing representatives with Medtronic, made copies and kept all paperwork involving this process.  My file is now quite thick.

My point in this letter is DON’T GIVE UP!!!!  I wasn’t going to stop appealing our request with BCBS for payment of the sensors for our daughter, and I won’t stop calling Medtronic for a refund until this gets corrected.  Our daughter is going to have to live with diabetes for the rest of her life, and if I can do anything to make her life and health issues easier to manage, as a mother I will continue to do that!

I have no arguments or complaints about how BCBS has covered healthcare needs for our family except for this issue.  We have had BCBS health insurance for the past 29 years, and they have always been very good about covering our daughter’s healthcare/diabetic needs.  I have no arguments or complaints about Medtronic’s products and their customer service.  Medtronic has always been very helpful and quick to respond with supply requests, pump problems or concerns!  For whatever reason, this issue involving the CBGM system seems to be problematic for many!

Also, as a subscriber of your magazine for the past five years, I want to let you know how much we enjoy your articles, your updates on new and ongoing research, product information, etc.  We have learned of many new products that Jae has been able to take advantage of because of the articles in your magazine!  Keep it up!

Thank you for reading this letter. Writing it has been cathartic for me, as no one really understands the frustration unless you have had to go through this yourself!

Sincerely, from a Mother’s Heart,

Patti Venekamp
Long Prairie, MN

Click Here To View Or Post Comments

Categories: A1c Test, Blood Glucose, Blood Sugar, Diabetes, Diabetes, Health Insurance, Insulin, Insulin Pumps, Legal, Letters to the Editor, Personal Stories


Take the Diabetes Health Pump Survey
See What's Inside
Read this FREE issue now
For healthcare professionals only

You can view the current or previous issues of Diabetes Health online, in their entirety, anytime you want.
Click Here To View

See if you qualify for our free healthcare professional magazines. Click here to start your application for Pre-Diabetes Health, Diabetes Health Pharmacist and Diabetes Health Professional.

Learn More About the Professional Subscription

Free Diabetes Health e-Newsletter

Latest
Popular
Top Rated
Print | Email | Share | Comments (5)

You May Also Be Interested In...


Comments

Posted by oakhaven on 13 June 2008

Patti is very much on the mark regarding "keep working on it until it works fairly." I use the Dexcom system with United Health Care as the insurance provider. In my case I didn't begin using the CGM system until UHC had agreed to pay for it. It took about 2 months and the Dexcom people were very helpful in working with them to effect the coverage. I just pay the 20% copay (about $60/month) and Dexcom is reimbursed by UHC for the rest. The worth of the CGM in glucose control (particularly managing hypoglycemia) makes all the effort worthwhile.

Posted by Anonymous on 14 June 2008

Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS) should be investigated by the regulators for this kind of bait and switch treatment.
Does anyone know of a senior politician or a broadcast TV journalist who would be interested in raising this issue for national scrutiny?

Posted by Anonymous on 16 June 2008

I like the idea you have about getting a politician or journalist envolved in this type of ordeal. BCBS shouldn't be allowed to handle situations like this.

Posted by Anonymous on 23 June 2008

I look forward to hearing the outcome of your situation. Battling insurance companies is difficult for one person...

Good Luck!

Posted by Anonymous on 13 August 2008

From the note about going through "about 10 sensors a month", I assume you're replacing them every 3days as recommended. Well, consider this...

While not approved by Medtronic, I personally find the sensors work great for 6-8 days (until the power for wireless transmission runs out). So consider stretching your dollars by getting as much out of your sensor as possible.

Cutting the costs you pay, and the remainder the insurance company has to cover will help both sides.


Add your comments about this article below. You can add comments as a registered user or anonymously. If you choose to post anonymously your comments will be sent to our moderator for approval before they appear on this page. If you choose to post as a registered user your comments will appear instantly.

When voicing your views via the comment feature, please respect the Diabetes Health community by refraining from comments that could be considered offensive to other people. Diabetes Health reserves the right to remove comments when necessary to maintain the cordial voice of the diabetes community.

For your privacy and protection, we ask that you do not include personal details such as address or telephone number in any comments posted.

Don't have your Diabetes Health Username? Register now and add your comments to all our content.

Have Your Say...


Username: Password:
Comment:
©1991-2014 Diabetes Health | Home | Privacy | Press | Advertising | Help | Contact Us | Donate | Sitemap

Diabetes Health Medical Disclaimer

The information on this site is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. All content, including text, graphics, images, and information, contained on or available through this website is for general information purposes only. Opinions expressed here are the opinions of writers, contributors, and commentators, and are not necessarily those of Diabetes Health. Never disregard professional medical advice or delay seeking medical treatment because of something you have read on or accessed through this website.