BBC Gets It Wrong About Broccoli’s Curative Abilities

Listen up, kids with diabetes! You may want to print this article and have it handy at the table in case your parents insist that you finish your broccoli...*

It turns out that the BBC was doing a bit of hasty generalizing: Although sulforaphane is found in broccoli, researchers have come nowhere near to saying that eating the vegetable will reproduce the effects they saw in the lab.

Aug 14, 2008

A recent story put out by the British Broadcasting Corporation proclaimed that eating broccoli could reverse the damage to heart blood vessels caused by diabetes.

The BBC based its announcement on research showing that sulforaphane, a compound found in broccoli, helps the production of enzymes that protect blood vessels and reduce the number of molecules that can cause cell damage.

It turns out that the BBC was doing a bit of hasty generalizing: Although sulforaphane is found in broccoli, researchers have come nowhere near to saying that eating the vegetable will reproduce the effects they saw in the lab.

Scientists at the University of Warwick and the University of Essex in England took blood vessel cells from non-diabetic persons and incubated some in high levels of sugar and others in low levels. The cells incubated in high levels of sugar suffered extensive damage, much like what happens in people with uncontrolled diabetes.

The researchers then applied sulforaphane directly to the damaged vessels. They found that sulforaphane activated a protein called nrf2 that caused a 300 to 500 percent increase in activity by enzymes (transketolase and glutathione reductase) that protect against cellular damage.

Incubation in high levels of sugar had caused a 300 percent increase in the presence of a free radical called reactive oxygen species (ROS), associated with cell damage. The presence of sulforaphane reduced ROS by 73 percent.

The researchers concluded that sulforaphane might eventually be useful in preventing blood vessel damage from high blood sugar, but noted that they have not yet tested it on patients with diabetes. They also said that it was way too early to conclude that sulforaphane could reverse—as opposed to stop—damage to injured vessels.

Where the BBC Erred

The BBC’s confusion came about in two ways: The first was when the researchers compared the concentrations of sulforaphane they used to the amounts that would be found in a person’s system after eating a helping of broccoli. What was intended as an easy-to-understand measure was misinterpreted by the BBC as an actual recommendation about eating broccoli.

The second was the leap of logic that the BBC made when it ignored the fact that the blood vessels under study did not come from people with diabetes and that the effects of sulforaphane appeared to be preventive, not restorative.

So, if you come across any articles touting the curative affects of broccoli, take them with a grain of salt.

Or maybe some pepper and a twist of lemon.

* Just kidding! We all know brocolli is good for us even if it does turn out to just prevent blood vessel damage rather than actually fix it.

Source: National Health Service, Great Britain

Click Here To View Or Post Comments

Categories: Blood Sugar, Diabetes, Diabetes, Exercise, Heart Care & Heart Disease, Nutrition Advice, Nutrition Research, Research, Reversing Complications


Take the Diabetes Health Pump Survey
See What's Inside
Read this FREE issue now
For healthcare professionals only
  • What's on the Horizon with Diabetes Research and Therapy
See the entire table of contents here!

You can view the current or previous issues of Diabetes Health online, in their entirety, anytime you want.
Click Here To View

See if you qualify for our free healthcare professional magazines. Click here to start your application for Pre-Diabetes Health, Diabetes Health Pharmacist and Diabetes Health Professional.

Learn More About the Professional Subscription

Free Diabetes Health e-Newsletter

Latest
Popular
Top Rated
Print | Email | Share | Comments (2)

You May Also Be Interested In...


Comments

Posted by volleyball on 15 August 2008

Very good rebuttal. Lab to reporter to population loses things in translation.
In the caveat, there seems to be the true message, leafy greens will help new cells from becoming damaged. And isn't that a good thing? I would think so.

Posted by Anonymous on 16 August 2008

Raw numbers from the lab, to the researcher looking for more grants, to the media looking for exciting headlines, to the people looking for a quick fix loses almost all meaning.


Add your comments about this article below. You can add comments as a registered user or anonymously. If you choose to post anonymously your comments will be sent to our moderator for approval before they appear on this page. If you choose to post as a registered user your comments will appear instantly.

When voicing your views via the comment feature, please respect the Diabetes Health community by refraining from comments that could be considered offensive to other people. Diabetes Health reserves the right to remove comments when necessary to maintain the cordial voice of the diabetes community.

For your privacy and protection, we ask that you do not include personal details such as address or telephone number in any comments posted.

Don't have your Diabetes Health Username? Register now and add your comments to all our content.

Have Your Say...


Username: Password:
Comment:
©1991-2014 Diabetes Health | Home | Privacy | Press | Advertising | Help | Contact Us | Donate | Sitemap

Diabetes Health Medical Disclaimer

The information on this site is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. All content, including text, graphics, images, and information, contained on or available through this website is for general information purposes only. Opinions expressed here are the opinions of writers, contributors, and commentators, and are not necessarily those of Diabetes Health. Never disregard professional medical advice or delay seeking medical treatment because of something you have read on or accessed through this website.