Take the Diabetes Health Pump Survey
See What's Inside
Read this FREE issue now
For healthcare professionals only
  • 12 Tips for Traveling With Diabetes
See the entire table of contents here!

You can view the current or previous issues of Diabetes Health online, in their entirety, anytime you want.
Click Here To View

See if you qualify for our free healthcare professional magazines. Click here to start your application for Pre-Diabetes Health, Diabetes Health Pharmacist and Diabetes Health Professional.

Learn More About the Professional Subscription

Free Diabetes Health e-Newsletter
Latest
Popular
Top Rated
Diabetes Archives
Print | Email | Share | Comments (10)

Treatment of Homes for Termites Decades Ago May Cause Diabetes Today


Mar 13, 2009

Your dwelling and your diet could be a source of chlordane exposure. From the 1950s until it was banned in 1975, millions of pounds of technical chlordane were applied to agricultural soil, mainly for crops such as corn, soybeans, and vegetables.

Obesity has long been accepted as a risk factor for diabetes. The results of four recently published studies, however, have revealed that the real risk factor may be the insecticides present in that fat. The initial investigations showed that the expected association between obesity and diabetes/insulin resistance was absent in people who had low levels of organochlorine insecticides in their blood (1, 2). However, the expected association between obesity and diabetes/insulin resistance increased with levels of these insecticides. In the last year, two additional studies have linked these insecticides with diabetes (3, 4).  

In all four studies, the insecticides that consistently had the greatest association with diabetes were compounds of the chlordane family (oxychlordane, trans-chlordane, trans-nanochlor, and heptachlor), all of which are found in technical chlordane. (See Audios, Reviews, and Scientific Reports)

Technical chlordane was used to treat termite infestation in approximately 30 million homes from the 1950s until it was banned in 1988.  Chlordane compounds are highly persistent in soil and vaporize at a slow rate.  Chlordane vapors migrate out of soil and into the air of homes through opening around pipes and cracks in concrete floors.  Once inhaled, chlordane compounds accumulate in the fat tissues. 

The level of chlordane compounds in the air of treated homes depends on where it was applied.  Today, the highest levels of chlordane in air of homes is from application below basement floors, followed by application to the soil under homes with concrete slab floors, which was a common construction practice in the South.  Lower levels are found in air from homes in which chlordane was applied to the soil of ventilated crawl spaces or the soil outside the foundation.  

Still here 30 years later

Chlordane levels in the air of homes are known to remain high 30-plus years after application. In a study in Massachusetts, chlordane, heptachlor, and/or dieldrin were found in the air of 50 to 60 percent of the homes tested, with levels four to 40 times the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) guidelines (5). Because termite infestation and treatment increase in warmer climates, these numbers should increase in homes located farther south. 

Recently, the Centers for Disease Control mapped the incidence of diabetes by state. There is a striking correlation between the incidence of diabetes and the use of chlordane for termite control in these states. (see the compare maps here).  Southern states with the highest temperatures and humidity have not only the highest rates of termite infestations and chlordane use, but also the highest rate of diabetes. States from the midsection of the United States, with moderate temperatures and humidity and lower chlordane applications, have lower rates of diabetes.  In northern states such as Minnesota, where chlordane was rarely used, the incidence of diabetes is less than 50 percent that of southern states.

For persons living in homes built prior to 1988 and located in the southern three-quarters of the United States, the main route of exposure is breathing chlordane in the air of their homes.  According to the United States Environmental Protection Agency, occupants of treated homes can have exposures up to 25 times those found in the average American diet. (6). 

For persons not living in chlordane-treated homes, the diet is the source of chlordane exposure. From the 1950s until it was banned in 1975, millions of pounds of technical chlordane were applied to agricultural soil, mainly for crops such as corn, soybeans, and vegetables.  Chlordane compounds are still found in food, especially in meat and dairy fats and, to a lesser extent, in grains and vegetables grown in treated soils. 

The persistence of chlordane in the soil and the uptake of chlordane by plants were demonstrated by a study conducted in 1998, in which vegetables grown in soils treated with technical chlordane in 1960 had high levels, especially zucchini and the peels of potatoes and carrots (7).  Although body burdens of other organochlorine insecticides, such as DDT and DDE, have diminished markedly over the last 20-plus years, levels of chlordane compounds in the U.S. populace have not declined to the same extent. Levels of chlordane compounds in body fat increase with age in the United States.  

Exchanging one problem for another

All of these insecticides are in the same class of organochlorines, called cyclodienes, which were first made in the 1940s.  Their development was by chance, during a search for possible uses of a byproduct of synthetic rubber manufacturing.  By chlorinating this byproduct, persistent and potent insecticides were easily and cheaply produced. The chlorines, seven in the case of heptachlor and eight in trans-chlordane, oxychlordane, aldrin, and dieldrin, surround and stabilize the cyclodiene ring (the carbon skeleton).  

Chlordane compounds are stable endocrine disruptors that have been shown by this author (8) and others to bind to estrogen receptors found in and on many cell types, including insulin-producing cells of the pancreas.  The binding of chlordane compounds to these receptors causes increases in oxidants and phosphorylation of regulator proteins.  Oxidants can directly damage insulin-producing cells in the pancreas and perpheral cells, limiting the production of insulin and the uptake of glucose (9).  Released oxidants can further induce the release of inflammatory mediators in various cells, initiating localized chronic inflammation.  

Besides diabetes and insulin resistance, exposure to chlordane compounds has been linked to a variety of symptoms (headache, lethargy, and upper respiratory infections), human cancers (prostate, breast, and testicular cancers, leukemia, and lymphoma), and chronic diseases (allergies, anxiety, depression, Parkinson's, and Crohn's disease). These symptoms and diseases could, at least in part, be caused by local chronic inflammation.

There is no safe level of exposure to chlordane compounds. However, two federal agencies have published minimal risk values.  The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry has established 10 ng/M3 as the Minimal Effect Level for non-cancer effects.  The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, however, reports that the same concentration of chlordane compounds in air increases lifetime cancer rates by 1 one in 1 one million exposed persons.  

Over the last 14 years, this author has sampled and analyzed the air of hundreds of homes in the United States.  There appears to be a relationship between the level of exposure of occupants to chlordane compounds and the severity of their symptoms.  High levels, greater than 300 nanograms of chlordane compounds per cubic meter of air (300 ng/M3), are usually associated with neurological problems, especially depression.  Scientific studies have now established links between diabetes and depression in patients (10).

What to do

Persons who have been diagnosed with diabetes and/or insulin resistance and would like to reduce their exposures to chlordane compounds should consider taking the following actions in the following order.  

  1. If you live in a house built before 1988 that is located in the southern three-quarters of the United States, test the air in your home for chlordane compounds.
  2. Reduce your consumption of meat and dairy fat.
  3. Consider peeling vegetables like potatoes and carrots grown in soils of unknown chlordane history.  

If chlordane is found in your home air, consider installing a heat-exchange ventilation system.  Most major heating/air conditioning manufacturers offer these systems, which have been shown to markedly reduce chlordane levels and can be easily interfaced to current ducting systems.

If you have questions about chlordane compounds in the air of your home and their health risks, email Dr. Cassidy at racassidy@psci.net or call 888.836.4489.  Additional information about chlordane, testing for chlordane in home air, links to other websites, and Dr. Cassidy's publications and bio can be found at www.toxfree.net.

Dr. Cassidy received a Doctorate of Toxicology from the University of Cincinnati Medical School, a Master of Science in Toxicology from University of Kentucky, and a Bachelor of Science in Biology from University of Evansville.

References:

  1. D. Lee, et al. (2006). A strong dose-response relationship between serum concentrations of persistent organic pollutants and diabetes. Diabetes Care.  29:1638-1644.
  2. D. Lee, et al. (2007). Association between serum concentrations of persistent organic pollutants and insulin resistance among nondiabetic adults. Diabetic Care. 30:622-628.
  3. S. Cox, et al. (2007).  Prevalence of self-reported diabetes and exposure to organochlorine pesticides among Mexican Americans: Hispanic health and nutritional examination survey, 1982-1984. Environmental Health Perspectives. 115:1747-1752.
  4. M. P. Montgomery, et al. (2008).  Incident diabetes and pesticide exposure among licensed pesticide applicators: Agricultural health study, 1993-2003. American Journal of Epidemiology Advance Access published March 14 2008.  http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/kwn028v1.
  5. R.A. Ruthann, et al. (2003). Phthalates, Alkylphenols, Pesticides, Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers, and other Endocrine-Disrupting Compounds in Indoor Air and Dust. Environmental Science & Technology. 37:4543-53.
  6. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1990). Nonoccupational pesticide exposure study (NOPES) EPA 600/3-90-003. NTIS no. PB90-152224.
  7. M. J. Mattina, et al. (2000). Chlordane Uptake and Its Translocation in Food Crops. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry. 48:1909-1915.
  8. R. A. Cassidy, et al. (2005). The link between the insecticide heptachlor epoxide, estradiol, and breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 90:55-64.
  9. N. Houstis, et al. (2006). Reactive oxygen species have a causal role in multiple forms of insulin resistance. Nature. 440:944-948.
  10. S. H. Golden, et al. (2008). Depressive Symptoms and Diabetes. JAMA. 300:2116.

Categories: Diabetes, Diabetes, Diets, Food, Food News, Insulin, Nutrition Research



You May Also Be Interested In...


Comments

Posted by krosetank on 19 March 2009

What a fantastic article! As someone who developed type-1 at the age of 39, (13 years ago) I have always wondered why. In my early 20s I worked in a program counting bugs and diseases in vegetable fields and am sure I was exposed to an assortment of pesticides. If so, why don't all farmers and farm workers who spray pesticides and work in treated fields get diabetes?

Is there any way to test your body for pesticide contamination? If so, is there any way to decontaminate? Would that bring back beta cell function? Any clarity on this by anyone be appreciated!

Posted by plemay on 19 March 2009

It is interesting to read about an environmental link to diabetes. VIetnam Veterans have a high incident rate for developing Type 2 diabetes as a result of exposure to Agent Orange, a chemical used to defoliate the trees in the jungle. Veterans would either be sprayed direct, or exposure was indirect. Vietnamese population suffered much from the chemical exposure as well.

Posted by Jerry1423 on 19 March 2009

Is this article based people who acquire Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes (or both)?
There really needs more reference of what type of diabetes is being referred to. They are similar. yet very differnt.

Posted by Anonymous on 19 March 2009

I came down wih type 1 diabetes after being in Texas in the 70s and lived in an apartment that I had sprayed all the time to get rid of insects both inside and outside. I live in the north since then but am now wondering if that exposure triggered the desease because I have no family history of diabetes before me.

Posted by MJV on 19 March 2009

Very interesting article! I was just diagnosed at age 47 with Type I diabetes. I only weigh 112 lbs, so obesity isn't a part of my problem. We have an annual pest inspection, because the land our house was built upon, used to be an apple orchard and had since become infested with termites. Our house was built in the late 60's and was treated for termites. (Side note...I have never been able to grow plants around the house perimeter, because they die.....pesticides?) I'm definitely going to pursue this. I'd also like to know, if my condition could be reversed.

Posted by Anonymous on 19 March 2009

can there be residual deposits found in fat tissue?? Is there a test for this? a chemical analysis of sort? I can down with type 1 at 47 with a house full of termites and many home efforts to rid them who know if one was chlordane??

Posted by Anonymous on 19 March 2009

Great article!

You (MJV & krosetank) both probably have Type 1.5 or LADA Diabetes, which is an autoimmune disease and is thought to need a trigger. If you haven't already had the test, you doctor can test you for GAD antibodies, which will show whether you have this type or not. It's worth knowing because it'll explain a lot.

Posted by Anonymous on 20 March 2009

This is interesting but I have read that Seattle has one of the higheest rates of Type 1 diabetes with thousans of cases estimated each year and I saw on the map that Washington state had only a small amount of pesticide use. Maybe this study refers to Type 2 diabetes.

Posted by Anonymous on 23 March 2009

thanks. Until I knew diabetes due to chemicals is temporary, could you write more about mechanisms of insecticides on pancreas.

Posted by Anonymous on 24 March 2009

I was pregnant with my son when we moved into our current house, built in '57, which is flanked by active apple orchards. They spray every year, with what I don't know. My son was diagnosed with type I diabetes at just 10 months of age. I have always wondered if the pesticides were an environmental trigger for his onset. We do not have type I in our history as far as we know. Any thoughts?


Add your comments about this article below. You can add comments as a registered user or anonymously. If you choose to post anonymously your comments will be sent to our moderator for approval before they appear on this page. If you choose to post as a registered user your comments will appear instantly.

When voicing your views via the comment feature, please respect the Diabetes Health community by refraining from comments that could be considered offensive to other people. Diabetes Health reserves the right to remove comments when necessary to maintain the cordial voice of the diabetes community.

For your privacy and protection, we ask that you do not include personal details such as address or telephone number in any comments posted.

Don't have your Diabetes Health Username? Register now and add your comments to all our content.

Have Your Say...


Username: Password:
Comment:
©1991-2014 Diabetes Health | Home | Privacy | Press | Advertising | Help | Contact Us | Donate | Sitemap

Diabetes Health Medical Disclaimer

The information on this site is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. All content, including text, graphics, images, and information, contained on or available through this website is for general information purposes only. Opinions expressed here are the opinions of writers, contributors, and commentators, and are not necessarily those of Diabetes Health. Never disregard professional medical advice or delay seeking medical treatment because of something you have read on or accessed through this website.