Take the Diabetes Health Pump Survey
See What's Inside
Read this FREE issue now
For healthcare professionals only
  • 12 Tips for Traveling With Diabetes
See the entire table of contents here!

You can view the current or previous issues of Diabetes Health online, in their entirety, anytime you want.
Click Here To View

See if you qualify for our free healthcare professional magazines. Click here to start your application for Pre-Diabetes Health, Diabetes Health Pharmacist and Diabetes Health Professional.

Learn More About the Professional Subscription

Free Diabetes Health e-Newsletter
Latest
Popular
Top Rated
Weight Loss Archives
Print | Email | Share | Comments (1)

Consensus Statement Recognizes the Legitimacy of Surgery as a Dedicated Treatment for Type 2 Diabetes in Carefully Selected Patients

Nov 27, 2009

This press release is an announcement submitted by Weill Cornell Medical College, and was not written by Diabetes Health.

Weill Cornell Medical College, New York

NEW YORK (Nov. 23, 2009) - A first-of-its-kind consensus statement on diabetes surgery is published online today in the Annals of Surgery. The report illustrates the findings of the first international consensus conference - Diabetes Surgery Summit (DSS) - where an international group of more than 50 scientific and medical experts agreed on a set of evidence-based guidelines and definitions that are meant to guide the use and study of gastrointestinal surgery to treat type 2 diabetes. The document is considered to be the foundation of diabetes surgery as a medical discipline of its own.

The Diabetes Surgery Summit was held at the Catholic University of Rome, Italy, under the auspices of 22 international medical and scientific organizations, notably including the American Diabetes Association, the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, Diabetes United Kingdom, The Obesity Society and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. A draft of the DSS consensus statement was critically reviewed by official representatives of these organizations during the recent 1st World Congress on Interventional Therapies for Type 2 Diabetes, held in New York City and organized by NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center.

At present, bariatric surgery is only available as a treatment for severe obesity, defined as having a body mass index (BMI) of 35 kg/m2 or more, according to National Institutes of Health (NIH) guidelines established in 1991. The DSS consensus statement acknowledges that the cutoff is arbitrary and not supported by scientific evidence, and recognizes the need to use more appropriate criteria for surgery in patients with diabetes.

"With an emphasis on caution and patient safety, the DSS position statement boldly advances a revolutionary concept: the legitimacy of gastrointestinal surgery as a dedicated treatment for type 2 diabetes in carefully selected patients," explains lead author Dr. Francesco Rubino, director of the gastrointestinal metabolic surgery program at NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical College and associate professor of surgery at Weill Cornell Medical College. "The recommendations from the Diabetes Surgery Summit are an opportunity to improve access to surgical options supported by sound evidence, while also preventing harm from inappropriate use of unproven procedures."

The article in the Annals of Surgery, co-authored by the DSS organizers on behalf of 50 voting delegates, summarizes the mounting body of evidence showing that bariatric surgery effectively reverses type 2 diabetes in a high proportion of morbidly obese patients, sometimes within weeks or even days, well before these patients have lost a significant amount of body weight.

Dr. Rubino's experimental studies demonstrated that gastric bypass surgery can improve type 2 diabetes through direct anti-diabetic mechanisms and not solely as a result of weight loss, a finding that has been corroborated by other researchers with both experimental and human investigations. Based on these data, the 50 international delegates of the Rome summit achieved strong consensus that certain intestinal bypass operations engage anti-diabetes mechanisms beyond those related to reduced food intake and body weight.

"This and the remarkable clinical efficacy of gastrointestinal surgery justify considering it as a specific diabetes intervention, rather than viewing diabetes remission merely as a collateral effect of weight-loss surgery," says Dr. David E. Cummings, a leading endocrinologist at the Diabetes & Obesity Center of Excellence of the University of Washington in Seattle and senior author of the consensus document. "That understanding may also usher in a new era of drug discovery and development based on the identification of the metabolic pathways and mechanisms that drive the disease."

"The diabetes surgery consensus statement, together with the combined American Diabetes Association/European Association for the Study of Obesity guidelines for treating diabetes published in January 2009, are major steps forward toward leading diabetes experts in recognizing the important role that surgery may play in the treatment of diabetes," says Dr. Philip R. Schauer of the Bariatric and Metabolic Institute, Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, another co-author of the report.

The NIH has already responded to the document's call for research, issuing several recent Requests for Applications for projects focusing on the effects of gastrointestinal surgery on diabetes, including in patients with a BMI as low as 30 kg/m2 (i.e., with only mild obesity).

"That's in line with the recommendations of the Rome summit," says co-author Dr. Lee M. Kaplan of the Boston Obesity and Nutrition Research Center, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital. "Understanding the mechanisms of action of surgery on diabetes is a unique opportunity to advance the treatment of the disease."

"In the United States, type 2 diabetes is a leading cause of death and the number-one cause of blindness, kidney failure and amputation," Dr. Cummings says. "It is also alarmingly on the rise worldwide, creating an increasing economic burden on both developed and developing countries. Given the global epidemic growth of diabetes and the relevance of ethnic and socio-economic aspects for diabetes surgery, geographical criteria were considered in the selection of delegates to ensure appropriate representation of regional issues."

"Prevention will always be the best strategy to approach the global epidemic of diabetes," says Dr. Rubino. "But gastrointestinal surgery promises to be an important addition to the armamentarium of available treatments, and its study may also allow us to understand the disease mechanism in depth. We can only prevent what we truly understand."

The BMI Debate

In its position statement, the Diabetes Surgery Summit states: "Surgery should be considered for the treatment of type 2 diabetes" in patients with a BMI of 35 or more "who are inadequately controlled by lifestyle and medical therapy." The statement goes on to state that diabetes surgery may also be appropriate for treatment of people with type 2 diabetes and merely mild-to-moderate obesity (BMI 30-35). This goes beyond parameters established by the NIH for bariatric surgery in 1991, which reserved bariatric surgery for people with a BMI of 35 or more with an obesity-related condition, or a BMI of 40 or more with or without any obesity-related condition. These parameters are still adhered to by most insurance companies in determining coverage of the surgery.

"The science of diabetes, obesity and surgery has significantly advanced since 1991, and the evidence suggests that a precise BMI cut-off of 35 is not a good predictor of whether or not surgery will induce diabetes remission or improvement," Dr. Schauer says.

Dr. Rubino explains that BMI is an inadequate measure as a stand-alone criterion for patient selection:

"Once a patient has full-blown diabetes, BMI can't accurately predict that patient's cardiovascular risk, much less who will and won't be likely to benefit from surgery. It simply doesn't make sense to offer the surgical option to a patient with a BMI of 35 and deny it to one with a BMI of 34, especially if the latter patient has more severe diabetes. The health risks associated with a BMI of 35 may vary, too, with gender, race and ethnicity, compounding its inadequacy as a parameter for patient selection. High up on our research agenda is the search for new eligibility criteria that should be based on diabetes-specific metrics, and include patient's history, metabolic profile and disease severity."

A Multidisciplinary Effort

The DSS consensus document emphasizes the importance of multidisciplinary approaches to guide the development of the discipline of diabetes surgery from the outset. A specific recommendation of the Diabetes Surgery Summit called for the establishment of a multidisciplinary, international taskforce that includes endocrinologists, surgeons, clinical and basic investigators and bioethicists, among others. The International Diabetes Surgery Taskforce has been established as a nonprofit organization that will cooperate with existing professional societies, government agencies and patient advocacy groups in order to expand and disseminate evidence-based knowledge of diabetes surgery.

In recognition of the importance of the new recommendations, several respected medical and surgical associations have already endorsed the DSS position statement. These organizations include The Obesity Society, Diabetes United Kingdom, the International Association for the Study of Obesity, the American Association for Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Diseases, and the Brazilian Society for Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery. Other groups and societies are expected to follow suit.

Diabetes Surgery Summit

On March 29 to 31, 2007, an international, multidisciplinary group of experts representing endocrinologists, gastroenterologists, diabetologists, surgeons, epidemiologists, clinical-trial design experts, and basic science investigators gathered at the Catholic University in Rome, Italy, to review the scientific evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of bariatric surgery to treat type 2 diabetes and to develop a diabetes surgery summit position statement. Approximately 400 people from 27 countries on 6 continents participated. Fifty voting delegates weighed the evidence and developed the position statement during and subsequent to the summit. Dr. Rubino conceived the idea of the DSS. Drs. Rubino, Kaplan, Schauer, and Cummings served as co-directors of the DSS and equally participated in the planning and execution of the conference. They have co-authored the report for the Annals of Surgery on behalf of the 50 voting DSS delegates. The Diabetes Surgery Summit was supported by generous grants from Covidien, Ethicon, Allergan, Storz, GI Dynamics, Roche, Amylin, and Power Medical Interventions. The sponsors had no role in any aspect of the conference organization, the selection of voting delegates, or the generation of consensus statements. They have not influenced the analysis of the findings, the preparation of the manuscript, or its content.

The International Diabetes Surgery Taskforce (IDSTF)

The IDSTF was created as a nonprofit organization of 20 members, representing diverse expertise in diabetes, obesity, surgery, gastroenterology, and clinical-trials development. The taskforce promotes DSS recommendations, collaborating with professional societies to expand and disseminate evidence-based knowledge of diabetes surgery.

Weill Cornell Medical College press release


Categories: Diabetes, Diabetes, Food, Type 2 Issues, Weight Loss



You May Also Be Interested In...


Comments

Posted by ndocroth on 2 December 2009

Yes, bariatric surgery does appear to stop diabetes. But, the big question is how many cases of diabetes and a need for costly bariatric surgery we could prevent by informing the public that...

…the sections of the small intestine bypassed by bariatric surgery among others have the following actions:
1) a healthy duodenum regulates the frequency and size of food parcels released from the stomach.
2) a well-functioning duodenum plays a role in the release of pancreatic enzymes and insulin.
3) a normal duodenum determines the release of bile from the liver/gallbladder and plays a role in the glycogen control mechanism.
4) the duodenum is among the tissues instrumental in the formation of vitamin K the vitamin responsible to keep calcium in the bones and out of the arteries AND which eventually gets stored in the pancreas(!).
5) much of the calcium and mineral absorption needs to take place in a healthy duodenum.

If the duodenum is inflamed, all its functions become affected, defective or fail.

The big question, therefore, should be HOW the duodenum may get to "mis-perform" and how to avoid this...

A large number of individuals and population groups (N-A average 43%, some groups up to 78%) carry the HLA-DQ8 and or HLA-DQ2 antigens that are also playing a role in celiac disease. CD/gluten-intolerance affects the duodenum and does not allow us to digest gluten-containing grains.

The link between celiac disease (the most severe form of gluten-intolerance) and type 1 diabetes along with many other autoimmune diseases already has been established.

On the other hand we know that most individuals suffering from obesity are addicted to carbohydrates - mostly from gluten-grains. Considering the content of opiate exorphins in gluten and casein (lactose), food addiction in individuals genetically so predisposed should not surprise.

Since obesity also has been linked with toxins (or, according to natural medicine, food allergies) that lead to tissue inflammation and storage of offending factors in additional adipose tissue the first step to prevent diabetes would appear to be to promote a low-carbohydrate and gluten-free approach to that half of our population carrying the respective antigens.

No foods we shouldn't eat - no duodenum inflammation - fewer breakdowns of function - less risk of diabetes - reduced need for surgery - less public and private health cost.

Rivkah Roth DO DNM® author of At Risk? Avoid Diabetes by Recognizing Early Risk - A Natural Medicine View and the DIABETES-Series Little Books.


Add your comments about this article below. You can add comments as a registered user or anonymously. If you choose to post anonymously your comments will be sent to our moderator for approval before they appear on this page. If you choose to post as a registered user your comments will appear instantly.

When voicing your views via the comment feature, please respect the Diabetes Health community by refraining from comments that could be considered offensive to other people. Diabetes Health reserves the right to remove comments when necessary to maintain the cordial voice of the diabetes community.

For your privacy and protection, we ask that you do not include personal details such as address or telephone number in any comments posted.

Don't have your Diabetes Health Username? Register now and add your comments to all our content.

Have Your Say...


Username: Password:
Comment:
©1991-2014 Diabetes Health | Home | Privacy | Press | Advertising | Help | Contact Us | Donate | Sitemap

Diabetes Health Medical Disclaimer

The information on this site is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. All content, including text, graphics, images, and information, contained on or available through this website is for general information purposes only. Opinions expressed here are the opinions of writers, contributors, and commentators, and are not necessarily those of Diabetes Health. Never disregard professional medical advice or delay seeking medical treatment because of something you have read on or accessed through this website.