Take the Diabetes Health Pump Survey
See What's Inside
Read this FREE issue now
For healthcare professionals only
  • 12 Tips for Traveling With Diabetes
See the entire table of contents here!

You can view the current or previous issues of Diabetes Health online, in their entirety, anytime you want.
Click Here To View

See if you qualify for our free healthcare professional magazines. Click here to start your application for Pre-Diabetes Health, Diabetes Health Pharmacist and Diabetes Health Professional.

Learn More About the Professional Subscription

Free Diabetes Health e-Newsletter
Latest
Popular
Top Rated
Pre-Diabetes Archives
Print | Email | Share | Comments (1)

Consensus Moving to A1c as a Better Predictor of Diabetes Than Fasting Glucose


Mar 26, 2010

A1c better identifies persons at risk for diabetes than fasting glucose, and it can better predict stroke, heart disease, and overall mortality.

Over the past few months, there has been a discernible shift of opinion among healthcare providers about which test best reveals a high risk of acquiring diabetes. The old standby, fasting glucose, seems to be giving way to the hemoglobin A1c test as the preferred method.

A just-published study by researchers at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health contends not only that the A1c better identifies persons at risk for diabetes than fasting glucose, but also that it can better predict stroke, heart disease, and overall mortality.

To prepare for a fasting glucose test, the patient must fast first, usually from midnight until the time a blood sample is drawn the next day. The level of blood glucose in the sample gives a good indication of whether the patient is non-diabetic, is at risk for diabetes, or has the disease. An A1c, on the other hand, indicates blood glucose levels over an extended period, usually 90 days, and does not require patients to fast.

Among the advantages of an A1c over the fasting glucose test, said the study's lead author, Elizabeth Selvin, PhD, MPH, is its low variability and reduced susceptibility to variance based upon illness or stress. For that reason, it is much less likely to produce a "false alarm" that could lead to a misdiagnosis.

Another advantage is that A1c levels are rendered in percentages that are easy to understand. The Johns Hopkins study identified an A1c of 5.0% to 5.5% as within the normal range. As the A1c percentage increases, so does the risk of acquiring diabetes. A1c's of 5.5% to 6% are considered "very high risk," indicating a nine-times greater likelihood of getting diabetes than an A1c within the normal range.

A patient with an A1c of 6.5% or greater, according to the researchers, should be considered to have diabetes. (The American Diabetes Association guidelines say that anyone with an A1c from 5.7% to 6.4% is "at very high risk" of acquiring diabetes within five years, while a range of 5.5% to 6% indicates a need to take preventive measures.)

The study relied on blood samples taken in the early 1990s from 11,000 black and white adults who did not have diabetes. By measuring the A1c's in those samples and then tracking which participants eventually developed diabetes, the researchers were able to establish some pretty solid indicators of diabetes risk.

The Johns Hopkins data are one more push in the direction of establishing the A1c as the preferred test for diabetes risk. Look for doctors and HMOs to begin offering it as a standard component in routine annual check-ups. 

The study appears in the March 4, 2010, issue of New England Journal of Medicine.

* * *

Source:

 http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-03/jhub-hao030110.php


Categories: A1c Test, Blood Glucose, Blood Sugar, Diabetes, Diabetes, Pre-Diabetes



You May Also Be Interested In...


Comments

Posted by Anonymous on 27 March 2010

Wouldn't both tests be better than one. God forbid that someone might have to fast! The A1C can really hide some awful control of glucose levels, as the test (from long experience) usually shows what's happening in the "last" month before the test. I've finally learned, after years, that one cannot really eat a "little" dessert, or all the junk that Americans consume. I know what my body tells me, along with my glucometer.


Add your comments about this article below. You can add comments as a registered user or anonymously. If you choose to post anonymously your comments will be sent to our moderator for approval before they appear on this page. If you choose to post as a registered user your comments will appear instantly.

When voicing your views via the comment feature, please respect the Diabetes Health community by refraining from comments that could be considered offensive to other people. Diabetes Health reserves the right to remove comments when necessary to maintain the cordial voice of the diabetes community.

For your privacy and protection, we ask that you do not include personal details such as address or telephone number in any comments posted.

Don't have your Diabetes Health Username? Register now and add your comments to all our content.

Have Your Say...


Username: Password:
Comment:
©1991-2014 Diabetes Health | Home | Privacy | Press | Advertising | Help | Contact Us | Donate | Sitemap

Diabetes Health Medical Disclaimer

The information on this site is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. All content, including text, graphics, images, and information, contained on or available through this website is for general information purposes only. Opinions expressed here are the opinions of writers, contributors, and commentators, and are not necessarily those of Diabetes Health. Never disregard professional medical advice or delay seeking medical treatment because of something you have read on or accessed through this website.