Take the Diabetes Health Pump Survey
See What's Inside
Read this FREE issue now
For healthcare professionals only
  • 12 Tips for Traveling With Diabetes
See the entire table of contents here!

You can view the current or previous issues of Diabetes Health online, in their entirety, anytime you want.
Click Here To View

See if you qualify for our free healthcare professional magazines. Click here to start your application for Pre-Diabetes Health, Diabetes Health Pharmacist and Diabetes Health Professional.

Learn More About the Professional Subscription

Free Diabetes Health e-Newsletter
Latest
Popular
Top Rated
Diabetes Health Reference Charts
Heart Care & Heart Disease Archives
Print | Email | Share | Comments (0)

Intensive BG Control and the Onset of Organ Damage in Type 2s


Jul 9, 2010

ACCORD (Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes) was a National Institutes of Health-funded study that began in 2001.

Data from the massive ACCORD study on intensive blood sugar control shows that lowering blood sugar levels in people with longstanding type 2 diabetes to near-normal may delay the appearance of signs that point to damage to nerves, eyes, and kidneys, but does not stop their progression toward it.

What happens instead is that while long-term damage seems inevitable, intensive blood sugar control may somewhat lessen that damage. After ACCORD's experiment with intensive control (an A1c goal of 6% or less) was halted in 2008, people who had undergone it showed less deterioration in a vision test and underwent 20 percent fewer cataract surgeries than people in the standard treatment group. They also showed 30 percent less leakage of protein into their urine, a sign of kidney disease and a marker for future heart problems. 

ACCORD (Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes) was a National Institutes of Health-funded study that began in 2001. The study tracked 10,251adults with type 2 diabetes to see if intense blood sugar control could delay the onset of cardiovascular problems caused by inflammation.

At the time, enrolled participants averaged 62 years of age, were obese, and had had type 2 an average of 10 years. About one-third had heart disease and the remainder carried at least two risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Half of them had A1c's of 8.1%, well above the 7% level recommended by the American Diabetes Association as "ideal" for people with type 2, and far above the below 6% figure for people without diabetes.

Participants in the intensive control category all received treatments designed to drive their blood sugar levels to near-normal. Further treatment included either intensive blood pressure control or blood lipid treatments designed to lower "bad" cholesterol and elevate "good" cholesterol.

The A1c target for the intensive control group was less than 6 percent, a level approaching that of adults who do not have diabetes. In contrast, 7% to 8% is considered an acceptable A1c range for people with type 2 diabetes. Both the intensive-control and standard-treatment groups in the study were treated with FDA-approved medications.

By 2008, researchers became alarmed when they saw that participants in the intensive blood sugar control group were running a 22 percent greater risk of death than members of the control group that were receiving standard blood sugar control therapy. (The absolute risk of death was 5 percent for the intensive group's members and 4 percent for the non-intensive control group.) They also found that the intensive group ran a three-times-higher risk of hypoglycemia than members of the control group (10.5 percent versus 3.5 percent overall).

Although researchers halted the intensive-control portion of the study, they continued to track post-study effects of lowered blood sugar levels on the development of eye, nerve and kidney complications. That's when they found that although people with longstanding type 2 inevitably progress toward such complications, their severity may be lessened  somewhat by intensive control.

One explanation for the increased death rate among intensive-control patients is that they may have been vulnerable to a dramatic change in treatment given their age, obesity, and the long time that they'd had diabetes. Some recent studies have called into question whether people who have type 2 for years can or need to achieve A1c levels below 7% without unduly risking their health.

Although the reasons why this is so are not clear, it may have to do with the body habituating itself to higher blood sugar levels and "learning" to live with them. Attempts to dramatically decrease those levels may cause a stress reaction that actually makes people more vulnerable to the cardiovascular problems lower A1c's were intended to avoid.


Categories: A1c Test, Blood Sugar, Complications & Care, Diabetes, Diabetes, Eye Care (Retinopathy), Heart Care & Heart Disease, Kidney Care (Nephropathy), Low Blood Sugar, Medications Research, Research, Reversing Complications, Type 2 Issues, Type 2 Medications



You May Also Be Interested In...


Comments


Add your comments about this article below. You can add comments as a registered user or anonymously. If you choose to post anonymously your comments will be sent to our moderator for approval before they appear on this page. If you choose to post as a registered user your comments will appear instantly.

When voicing your views via the comment feature, please respect the Diabetes Health community by refraining from comments that could be considered offensive to other people. Diabetes Health reserves the right to remove comments when necessary to maintain the cordial voice of the diabetes community.

For your privacy and protection, we ask that you do not include personal details such as address or telephone number in any comments posted.

Don't have your Diabetes Health Username? Register now and add your comments to all our content.

Have Your Say...


Username: Password:
Comment:
©1991-2014 Diabetes Health | Home | Privacy | Press | Advertising | Help | Contact Us | Donate | Sitemap

Diabetes Health Medical Disclaimer

The information on this site is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. All content, including text, graphics, images, and information, contained on or available through this website is for general information purposes only. Opinions expressed here are the opinions of writers, contributors, and commentators, and are not necessarily those of Diabetes Health. Never disregard professional medical advice or delay seeking medical treatment because of something you have read on or accessed through this website.