Mouse Study Eliminates Need for Insulin by Eliminating Glucagon

| Feb 16, 2011

Can't make insulin? That might not be a problem, according to Dr. Roger Unger, the lead researcher on a mouse study out of UT Southwestern Medical Center. As Dr. Unger stated in a press release, his findings "suggest that if there is no glucagon, it doesn't matter if you don't have insulin....In adulthood, at least with respect to glucose metabolism, the role of insulin is to control glucagon. And if you don't have glucagon, then you don't need insulin...If diabetes is defined as restoration of glucose homeostasis to normal, then this treatment can perhaps be considered very close to a ‘cure.' "

It's pretty surprising, but it worked in mice that had been genetically altered to lack working glucagon receptors. When Dr. Unger gave an oral glucose tolerance test to the mice after their insulin-producing beta cells had been destroyed, they responded normally. Thus, they did not develop diabetes despite the fact that they had neither insulin nor glucagon action.

Glucagon is generally thought to cause the liver to release sugar into the bloodstream when it's needed. Blood sugar is then ushered into the cells by insulin.  Exactly how Dr. Unger's mice get glucose from their bloodstream into their cells without insulin is not clear. But it is apparent that the endocrine system may be even more complex than we thought and that ongoing research is always warranted.

Dr. Unger's study appears online and in the February issue of Diabetes.


Click Here To View Or Post Comments

Categories: Animal Insulin, Blood Sugar, Diabetes, Diabetes, Endocrinology, Insulin, The Cure

Take the Diabetes Health Pump Survey
See What's Inside
Read this FREE issue now
For healthcare professionals only

You can view the current or previous issues of Diabetes Health online, in their entirety, anytime you want.
Click Here To View

See if you qualify for our free healthcare professional magazines. Click here to start your application for Pre-Diabetes Health, Diabetes Health Pharmacist and Diabetes Health Professional.

Learn More About the Professional Subscription

Free Diabetes Health e-Newsletter

Top Rated
Print | Email | Share | Comments (1)

You May Also Be Interested In...


Posted by Anonymous on 12 October 2011

So, if you have no glucagon then you're not hypoglycemic in this model? So much for silly little snippets of information. This is another study that sounds like all we need is a pill to prevent the glucagon release.. Never happen...! Another win for academia...

Add your comments about this article below. You can add comments as a registered user or anonymously. If you choose to post anonymously your comments will be sent to our moderator for approval before they appear on this page. If you choose to post as a registered user your comments will appear instantly.

When voicing your views via the comment feature, please respect the Diabetes Health community by refraining from comments that could be considered offensive to other people. Diabetes Health reserves the right to remove comments when necessary to maintain the cordial voice of the diabetes community.

For your privacy and protection, we ask that you do not include personal details such as address or telephone number in any comments posted.

Don't have your Diabetes Health Username? Register now and add your comments to all our content.

Have Your Say...

Username: Password:
©1991-2014 Diabetes Health | Home | Privacy | Press | Advertising | Help | Contact Us | Donate | Sitemap

Diabetes Health Medical Disclaimer

The information on this site is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. All content, including text, graphics, images, and information, contained on or available through this website is for general information purposes only. Opinions expressed here are the opinions of writers, contributors, and commentators, and are not necessarily those of Diabetes Health. Never disregard professional medical advice or delay seeking medical treatment because of something you have read on or accessed through this website.