Take the Diabetes Health Pump Survey
See What's Inside
Read this FREE issue now
For healthcare professionals only
  • 12 Tips for Traveling With Diabetes
See the entire table of contents here!

You can view the current or previous issues of Diabetes Health online, in their entirety, anytime you want.
Click Here To View

See if you qualify for our free healthcare professional magazines. Click here to start your application for Pre-Diabetes Health, Diabetes Health Pharmacist and Diabetes Health Professional.

Learn More About the Professional Subscription

Free Diabetes Health e-Newsletter
Latest
Popular
Top Rated
Diabetes Health Reference Charts
A1c Test Archives
Print | Email | Share | Comments (3)

New Blood Sugar Guidelines Give Older Type 2s More Latitude


May 3, 2012

It may be better for older people with type 2 diabetes to have less stringent A1C goals than younger type 2s, according to new guidelines from the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes.

The recommendations, published on April 19, mark a change from previously accepted thought that everyone with type 2 diabetes should pursue an A1C below 7%. (The ADA is now recommending an even lower A1C than before: 6% to 6.5%. An A1C below 5.6% is generally accepted as indicating a diabetes-free state.)

The new thinking is that an A1C of below 7% is a suitable goal for young, healthy, motivated people who have the energy to make the effort to attain it. The new recommendations call for type 2s aged 65 years and older to focus on achieving less stringent A1C targets, ranging from 7.5% to 8%. The reasoning behind the change is concern about older people's greater vulnerability to hypoglycemia, as well the effect that the numerous drugs they may be taking could have on their effort to achieve a low A1C.

The ADA and EASD guidelines also call for metformin as the first-line treatment for newly diagnosed cases of type 2. The only exception is people whose A1C after diagnosis is close enough to normal to try lifestyle changes alone to manage the disease. The guidelines call for the addition of a second drug if three months of metformin alone does not bring down their A1C sufficiently.   

According to both associations, the new guidelines take a more patient-centered approach, matching blood sugar goals to the patient in terms of age and medical history, rather than demanding a one-size-fits-all percentage.


Categories: A1C, A1C Levels, A1c Test, Blood Glucose Levels, Blood Sugar, Diabetes, Diabetes, Hypoglycemia, Metformin, Monitoring, Type 2 Issues



You May Also Be Interested In...


Comments

Posted by Anonymous on 3 May 2012

The term "lifestyle changes" sounds pretty meaningless to me.

The ADA and EASD need to work on a simpler, more direct message: If you have diabetes, dramatically reduce your consumption of foods with starches (bread, pasta, potatoes, rice, etc.) and added sugar. These kinds of carbs are toxic to a diabetic. I think the same advice applies to a pre-diabetic also.

In addition, diabetics should be encouraged to test how their bodies react to carbs by taking BG readings one hour after eating a variety of foods.

Posted by kilty on 8 May 2012

This is just another attempt by the government to remove our access to successful medical care. If you stop proper care and meds for those over 65 the government has much to gain.
They will not have to make big pay outs to doctors, hospitals and teams for our care.
They will not have to pay for help in recovering from our problems due to Diabetes.
Just think of how they can balance the budget on the backs of the aging population.
My A1c is 6.1 think I will just continue with my current program and see if I can survive past 78.
Just think how many in the over 65 community have worked all their lives and paid into Medicare and Social Security for the pitiful benefits received;they will be dead and the government will not have to pay a dime. What a way to go!

Posted by Anonymous on 14 May 2012

I am 67 and have been diagnosed with type 2 for 6 years. Managed by losing 50 lbs and increasing my exercise to 30-75 minutes daily while limiting carbs to 175. After 1 1/2 years, added metformin to control BG; another year later went on long and short acting insulins in addition. A1Cs have gone from 6.1 to current 7.6, with hypoglycemic incidents of 47 or 54, sometimes in the middle of the night. On vacation at luxury resort, BG spikes three times what it is at home (and I brought my own food with me!)...I can't watch a movie or the news without a significant BG spike. Food is almost the least of the challenges in reducing BG. Anyway, it's interesting that age is somehow correlated with hypoglycemia, I will have to look into that...it is such a scary experience. Nothing about this disease is intuitive or easy!


Add your comments about this article below. You can add comments as a registered user or anonymously. If you choose to post anonymously your comments will be sent to our moderator for approval before they appear on this page. If you choose to post as a registered user your comments will appear instantly.

When voicing your views via the comment feature, please respect the Diabetes Health community by refraining from comments that could be considered offensive to other people. Diabetes Health reserves the right to remove comments when necessary to maintain the cordial voice of the diabetes community.

For your privacy and protection, we ask that you do not include personal details such as address or telephone number in any comments posted.

Don't have your Diabetes Health Username? Register now and add your comments to all our content.

Have Your Say...


Username: Password:
Comment:
©1991-2014 Diabetes Health | Home | Privacy | Press | Advertising | Help | Contact Us | Donate | Sitemap

Diabetes Health Medical Disclaimer

The information on this site is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. All content, including text, graphics, images, and information, contained on or available through this website is for general information purposes only. Opinions expressed here are the opinions of writers, contributors, and commentators, and are not necessarily those of Diabetes Health. Never disregard professional medical advice or delay seeking medical treatment because of something you have read on or accessed through this website.